Legal Opinion

Shaw v. . Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1910Published

1Opinion of the Court

MANNING, J., concurs in the result; BROWN, J., dissenting. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages of the defendant for the negligent failure to deliver a telegram, in words and figures as follows:

DURHAM, N.C. 29 June, 1908.

MRS. RINEY ROGERS, No. 419 South Street, Wilson, N.C.

Come at once. Ida and I are sick with malarial fever.

GUS SHAW.

The sendee was the sister of the plaintiff, the sender of the message. It appears that there are two houses in Wilson numbered 419 — one at the corner of South and Lodge streets, and the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Young v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Hendricks v. W. U. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Williams v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Sherill v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Thompson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API