Legal Opinion

Purler-Cannon-Schulte, Inc. v. City of St. Charles

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2004No. ED 83325PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Purler-Cannon-Schulte, Inc. and Kar-sten Equipment Company (“Contractors”) appeal from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the City of St. Charles and the Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (“Department”). 1 Contractors assert that the trial court erred in that: (1) Department’s enforcement of the Prevailing Wage Act violates article X, section 21 of the Missouri Constitution (“the Hancock Amendment” 2 ); (2) Department’s application of the Occupational Title Rule to outdoor pipe projects violates the Prevailing Wage Act; and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Boone County Court v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Utility Service Co. v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State ex rel. Public Counsel v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Dilts v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Missouri Energy Development Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Bledsoe Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Eldorado Springs R-II School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API