Legal Opinion
In re Seely
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided June 5, 2013No. 2:12-bk-11522-BBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR TURNOVER OF PROPERTY OF ESTATE AND SURCHARGE OF DEBTORS’ EXEMPT ASSETS
SHERI BLUEBOND, Bankruptcy Judge.
Chapter 7 trustee John J. Menchaca (the “Trustee”) moved for turnover of $113,802.13 from debtors James Grove Seely, III and Gabriela Paul (jointly, the “Debtors”), representing $58,259.16 in nonexempt cash that was on hand as of the petition date (the “Prepetition Cash”) plus an additional $55,542.98 in nonexempt cash that the Debtors received during the pen-dency of this bankruptcy case (the “Post-petition Cash”). The trustee based his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtors. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Creditor-Appellant v. Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Latman v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- In Re GoldsteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2007
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re IrwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Massenburg v. Schlossberg (In re Massenburg)District Court, D. Maryland · 2016