Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bryan v. Clark

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 24, 2017No. 16-1172, 16-1213, 16-1214Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBriscoe, Circuit Judge

I join the majority opinion, except for its rejection of one issue raised by the trustee in his cross appeal. The trustee argues, and I agree, that the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) erred by disregarding the bankruptcy court’s acceptance of a proposal by the trustee to take the commission he earned pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 326 from the estate, rather than includ*1083ing it as part of the 11 U.S.C. § 506(c) surcharge against the portion of the net sale proceeds subject to Arthur Clark’s hen. In my view, the BAP overlooked this important fact in rendering its initial decision, and subsequently…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. In Re Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors. Fowler Brothers v. Robert J. Young and Donna M. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API