Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 14, 2013No. 2013-5043UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Federal Claims dismissed Mr. Colie Davis’s claims for retirement pay for lack of jurisdiction. The Claims Court held the six-year statute of limitations had run for Mr. Davis’s claims. Davis v. United States, 108 Fed.Cl. 331 (2012). Because the Claims Court properly held that the limitations period had expired and that Mr. Davis’s claims were not continuing, this court affirms.

I

Mr. Davis was inducted into the Army in 1965 and, except for a period between 1967 and 1968, was on active duty until 1986. Davis, 108 Fed.Cl. at 334. In 1982, the Army informed Mr. Davis by letter that he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. John B. Goodrich (Doing Business as Checkerboard Cattle Co.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Floorpro, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Wells v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  2. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  3. State of Ohio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API