Legal Opinion

STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1992No. 91-CA-163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

594 So.2d 521 (1992)

STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT

v.

Alfred SCRAMUZZA, et al.

No. 91-CA-163.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

January 31, 1992.

Ronald J. Bertrand, Rayne, for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas Lee, Harahan, Mack E. Barham, Robert E. Arceneaux, Barham & Markle, PLC, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

Before FINK, J. Pro Tem., and KLIEBERT and BOWES, JJ.

ELORA C. FINK, Judge Pro Tem.

For the reason assigned this day in no. 91-CA-162, State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation & Development v. Scramuzza, 594 So.2d 517 consolidated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development v. ScramuzzaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development v. ScramuzzaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. ScramuzzaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. ScramuzzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Eubanks v. SalmonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Petranick v. White Consolidated IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API