Legal Opinion

People v. Dingle

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 14, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.

*380Because this court concludes that the sale of a pay-per-ride MetroCard does not constitute petit larceny, defendant’s motion to dismiss that charge must be granted.1

Defendant stands charged by information with petit larceny, loitering, and illegal access to Transit Authority facilities, premised on allegations that on February 18, 2008, at about 2:35 p.m., inside the subway station at 116th Street and Lexington Avenue in Manhattan, defendant was standing for five minutes in front of the turnstiles, but did not enter the turnstiles to access a subway…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. MattocksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. ZayasCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API