Legal Opinion

Molette v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Criminal Court of Dallas. Tried before the Hon. Geo. H. Craig. cited Abram v. The State, 10 Ala. 928 ; Isham v. The State, 38 Ala. 213 ; Hale’s P. C. 509; 3 Cro. Rep. 538; 1 Bishop’s Criminal Law, §§ 411, 421-2; 3 Cush. 558.

1Opinion of the Court

■ PETERS, J.

— This is a criminal prosecution by indictment for the offence of mayhem, occasioned by biting off the ear, or part of it. The proofs show that the- accused had a fight, or “ scuffle,” with Burwell Molette, in the County of Dallas, the county in which the indictment was found; and that, during this scuffle, he bit off the ear of said Burwell Molette, or some part of it. It seems that Burwell Molette had grossly insulted Bama Molette, the sister of the accused, in her own house; and the fight grew out of this circumstance. There was no evidence of any ill-will between the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AbramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Patterson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API