Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Life of Maryland, Inc. v. Katz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1983No. 82-1554PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator argues that respondent has improperly refused to consider its application for a certificate of authority. We disagree.

Relator contends that respondent’s policy of considering fifteen applications at each of its meetings, which are held four times a year, is an administrative rule which does not conform to the statutory scheme of the requirements of R.C. Chapter 119, the Administrative Procedure Act. R.C. 119.01(C) defines a rule as: “* * * any rule, regulation, or standard, having a general and uniform operation, adopted, promulgated, and enforced by any agency under the authority of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Savage v. CaltriderOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Ohio Department of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API