Legal Opinion

Neugebauer v. Gill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated January 6, 2003, as, upon granting the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 made at the close of the plaintiffs case at the trial on the issue of damages to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish, prima facie, that she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), is in favor of the defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Godlewska v. NiznikiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Crespo v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Villalta v. SchechterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berktas v. McMillianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Siegel v. SumaliyevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Gomez v. Ford Motor Credit Co.New York Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Desormeau v. Metropolitan Transit Long Island BusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API