Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1977No. 7621SC559PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. We think the contention has merit.

To make out a case of malicious prosecution it is necessary that the plaintiff show (1) malice, (2) want of probable cause, and (3) a favorable termination of the proceedings upon which his action is based. Taylor v. Hodge, 229 N.C. 558, 50 S.E. 2d 307 (1948).

Plaintiff has shown a favorable termination of all three proceedings which were instituted against him by defendant. He showed that both trespass charges were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Morgan v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Taylor v. . HodgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strickland v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API