Legal Opinion

Crown Cycle Co. v. Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Multnomah : Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action by Crown Cycle Company against Sherman D. Brown to recover the value of goods sold and delivered to defendant. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The amended complaint herein, omitting formal allegations, runs as follows: “That on or about the first day of March, 1896, the .plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the defendant, sold and delivered to defendant certain goods, wares, and merchandise, of the ■reasonable value of $12,234.” The answer denies that the plaintiff sold or delivered to the defendant any goods, wares, or merchandise whatever, except under a special contract of purchase and sale between them, which provided for the payment of a stipulated price at a time certain, which had not elapsed at the commencement…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Nichols v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Cederson v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Ankeny v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Norden v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. MacDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Kiernan v. KratzOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Massey v. BeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Daniels v. Foster & KleiserOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Holmes v. WolfardOregon Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API