Diebel v. Diebel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Steele county against Adam Diebel, Andrew Diebel and Emil Mann for specific performance of a certain contract for tbe sale of land. Tbe substance of tbe pleadings will be found in tbe opinion. Tbe case was tried before Buckbam, J., wbo made findings of fact and conclusions of law as stated in tbe opinion. Erom orders denying tbeir separate motions for a new trial, Childress, J., defendants Adam Diebel and Andrew Diebel appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action for specific performance of a written contract for the conveyance of a farm of one hundred thirty-five acres in tbe *169county of Steele. The complaint alleged the execution of the contract by the defendant Mann, whereby he sold and agreed to convey the land to the plaintiff and the defendant Adam Diebel upon the payment of the purchase price, and, further, that the plaintiff had tendered to the vendor the purchase price and demanded a conveyance in accordance with the contract. The defendants answered separately.
The answer of the defendant Adam Diebel was to the effect that he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Benson v. MarkoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Errett v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Forest Lake State Bank v. EkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- American Fruit Product Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Northwestern Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. E. Henry Wemme Endowment FundOregon Supreme Court · 1938