Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Mahlen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 3, 1927No. 26248PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

One E. R. Darrow entered into a contract to erect an apartment house and remove a residence for one Mrs. Kate Wells, for the price of $23,000. He furnished two bonds, eách for $23,000, one for the faithful performance of the contract, and one for the payment of all workmen and furnishers of materials; and plaintiff became his surety on both bonds.

I

On the same day the defendants entered into a contract of indemnity towards plaintiff, the condition thereof being that, whereas plaintiff had furnished the two bonds aforesaid, therefore said indemnitors agreed (in effect) to hold said plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Meyer v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Hogan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Ellis v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  4. Jocelyn v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. People ex rel. Smith v. Common CouncilIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weingart v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API