McCague v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried, below before Dickinson, J. The statutes contain numerous provisions which require void taxes to be refunded to the payer thereof.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried, below before Dickinson, J. The statutes contain numerous provisions which require void taxes to be refunded to the payer thereof. (:Toumlin v. City of Omaha, 25 Neb. 817; Morris v. Merrell, 44 Neb. 423; Caldwell v. City of Lincoln, 19 Neb. 569; Chicago, B. é Q. R. Co. v. County of Nemaha, 50 Neb. 393; Supervisors v. United States, 4 Wall. [U. S.] 435; Galena v. Amy, 5 Wall. [U. S.] 705; City of Indianapolis v. McAvoy, 86 Ind. 587; People v. Commissioners of. Buffalo County, 4 Neb. 150; State v. Farney, 36 Neb. 537; People v. Supervisors,…
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
The facts upon which this action was predicated may be summarized thus: The city of Omaha opened and extended South Nineteenth street through Hartman’s Addition, and to pay the costs and expenses thereof the municipal authorities levied special assessments upon the adjacent lots, including lots 60, 61, 66, 67, 72, 73, and 78 in said Hartman’s Addition to the city of Omaha. These special taxes or assessments not having been paid by the lot owners at the time the same became delinquent, the lots heretofore mentioned were sold by the county treasurer to Edward B. Baer, at private sale, for said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adams v. OsgoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Pennock v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Caldwell v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Dixon County v. BeardshearNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Merrill v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barkley v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Arnold v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Speidel v. Scotts Bluff CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933