United States v. American Railway Express Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
[Affirmed.]
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge
This case arises .upon an importation of sweet cream from Canada. The cream was transported in 8-gallon metal cans, which were covered by so-called “can jackets.”- These are detachable covers made of cotton and felt. They are strapped over and around the cans, and are designed to preserve the cream at an even temperature while in transit.
The collector rightly admitted the cream itself to free entry under paragraph 547, tariff act of 1913. The metal cans, however, he assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per cent ad valorem as cylindrical iron vessels for holding liquids whether full or empty,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MarxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Pacific Creosoting Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Wright & Graham Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Schmidt v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- British Overseas Airways Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Brabant Needle Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Frank P. Dow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Marques Del Merito, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.