Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pepple v. Parkview Memorial Hospital, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 1987No. 92A03-8701-CV-10Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

The majority holds that an arbitrary and capricious decision by a private hospital to curtail a physician’s staff privileges is not subject to judicial review. I respectfully dissent.

At least one Indiana case, Kennedy v. St. Joseph Memorial Hospital of Kokomo, Indiana, Inc. (1985) 1st Dist. Ind.App., 482 N.E.2d 268, has appeared to apply a standard which permits review of private hospital action for arbitrariness or capriciousness. I disagree with footnote 3 of the majority opinion here insofar as it suggests that the Kennedy case applied the standard to a public hospital.

I believe it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Memorial Hospital for McHenry County v. The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Essex v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. City of Marion v. AntrobusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API