Legal Opinion · Dissent
Claim of Fine v. S.M.C. Microsystems Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1989Published
1Dissent
Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ.,
dissent and vote to affirm in a memorandum by Harvey, J. Harvey, J. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent and would affirm the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board.
It is elementary that a liberal approach should be taken in dealing with this branch of the law (see, Matter of Hille v Gerald Records, 23 NY2d 135, 137). In keeping with this approach, in Matter of Stark v Hoff Lithograph Co. (79 AD2d 780) this court affirmed an award to a claimant who took payroll records to her home about three times a month. "The position of responsibility and authority…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Hille v. Gerald RecordsNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Claim of Broich v. New York State Union College of OptometryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Claim of Watson v. Graphic Management SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Levi v. Interstate Photo Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Claim of Gennarelli v. Spruce-Up Cleaners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.