Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Operation Rescue
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1996No. A070725PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
Defendants Operation Rescue of California and Robert Lynn Cochran appeal from a permanent injunction establishing place and manner restrictions on demonstrations conducted at: (1) a clinic operated by plaintiff Planned Parenthood Association of San Mateo County, and (2) the home of plaintiff Dr. O., a physician who treats patients at the clinic. The primary issue presented is whether the restrictions go beyond the guidelines of Madsen v. Women’s Health Center, Inc. (1994) 512 U.S. 753 [129 L.Ed.2d 593, 114 S.Ct. 2516] (Madsen) to impinge upon protected speech.
We conclude: (1)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Lam v. NgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Planned Parenthood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Breneric Associates v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.