Legal Opinion

Langhan v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 19, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Division, No. 3).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt —

Reversing.

The city of Louisville is a city of the first class, and the manner of reducing its limits, or extending them by the annexation of territory, which is contiguous to its present boundaries, is governed by the provisions of sections 2761 to, and including 2764, Kentucky Statutes. On the 5th day of October, 1918, in accordance with the provisions of the above mentioned statutes, the general council of the city, adopted an ordinance, providing for the annexation to the city of something in excess of eight thousand acres of land, which included two…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Masonic Widows & Orphans Home & Infirmary v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. City of Louisville v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Adams v. City of JeffersontownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Langhan v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API