Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1940No. O-2927Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN -C.yucll -- Honorable Uarren l&Donald county Attorney mth county WlUr, %XblJ Your ruaent intoa of fht8 dspsyt- rant on the querti ted ha8 buen ruaelved. oner8* Court nbde c cQmp8uy to px%int lathe dullnquent , and ocmtW other o*euel contract, eta. t oontrbot lms 3.naimot ty 8uthQPlxud the p?abUOb- inquest tax suits ln a onewithwhlahtheghad the avur to the que8ticm that I want to them or not thu Cozmulb8lonerr~Court haa the authority to enter into the eontract as above outlined, end vhether the ahurlff ha8 the dioaretion or authority to 9lbae…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Travis CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Mote v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Stoneman v. BilbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Rousset v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API