Hull v. Town of Newtown
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtEspinosa, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether certain policy and procedures of the Newtown Police Department (department) imposed a ministerial duty on its officers to search Stanley Lupienski, an individual suffering from auditory hallucinations and shortness of breath, when they took him into custody pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-503 (a). 1 The plaintiffs, Andrew Hull and Erica Hull, 2 appeal 3 from the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, the town of Newtown. The plaintiffs contend that the arrest section of the department's policy (arrest…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Payne v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Perez v. Metropolitan District CommisssionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- DAB Three, LLC v. LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018