Sturtevant v. Greater Los Angeles Zoo Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*50Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
We hold in this case that where, as here, a decedent’s will attempts to specify the manner in which death taxes are to be allocated but does so in an ambiguous manner, extrinsic evidence is admissible to clarify the decedent’s intent. We also hold that a direction in a will, as construed with the aid of extrinsic evidence, that all death taxes are to be paid by the residuary estate created by a living trust executed at the same time as the will and as part of an integrated testamentary plan satisfies the requirements of subdivision (b)(1) of section 20110 of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bolstad v. Wells Fargo Bank American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Estate of HendricksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.