Legal Opinion

Hartlove v. E. & H. Bottling Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 19, 1931No. [No. 17, January Term, 1931.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court granting a new trial, and from its refusal to strike out that order.

The order was passed on motion of the defendant after a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in a suit for personal injuries. The grounds stated in the motion were the formal ones usually assigned, and, in addition, misconduct on the part of the jury.

It is urged by appellant that there was abuse of discretion by the trial judge; that there was no real hearing of the motion, but that the judge acted on ex parte representations made to him privately by defendant’s attorney, and on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wash., B. A.R. Co. v. KimmeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Chiswell v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  3. Waters v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  4. Stern v. BenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Snyder v. CearfossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Buck v. Cam's Broadloom Rugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Scruggs v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  4. Carlile v. Two Guys From Harrison, Glen Burnie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Isley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API