United States v. La Fetra
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
On Application for 'Review of Decisions by the Board of United States General Appraisers. One of the decisions below is reported as G. A. 6,757 (T. D. 28, 966). The property in controversy consists of embroidered gloves, which are described as follows by the board: “The style of embroidery in. issue is illustrated by Exhibits A, B, and 0, which show three points- each; each point having three distinct rows of stitching.
Read the full summary
On Application for 'Review of Decisions by the Board of United States General Appraisers. One of the decisions below is reported as G. A. 6,757 (T. D. 28, 966). The property in controversy consists of embroidered gloves, which are described as follows by the board: “The style of embroidery in. issue is illustrated by Exhibits A, B, and 0, which show three points- each; each point having three distinct rows of stitching. Such stitching shows nine easily distinguishable chains of embroidery on the outside of the backs of the gloves, and nine single rows of stitching on the inside of the backs…
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
Gloves exactly like those covered by these protests have been passed upon by this court in Trefousse et al. v. United States (C. C.) 144 Fed. 708, T. D. 27,023, and were found not to be subject to the cumulative duty of 40 cents per dozen pairs provided for in the latter part of paragraph 445 of the tariff act of 1897 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule N, 30 Stat. 193, [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1677J). That decision should stand unless the government has succeeded in showing that such gloves as these 'were uniformly, commonly, and generally known -in the tra.de of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trefousse v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WertheimerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Field v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915