Legal Opinion

Roe v. Picou

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 18, 1978No. 62816PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

361 So.2d 874 (1978)

William A. ROE, Vernon Dowdy and Jerry Blanchard, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Respondents,

v.

Dallas Arnold PICOU, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Relator.

No. 62816.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

August 18, 1978.

George M. Strickler, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant-relator.

Chalin O. Perez, New Orleans, Michael Kirby, Port Sulphur, Luke A. Petrovich, Buras, for plaintiffs-appellees-respondents.

TATE, Justice.

By certain proceedings in district court, the defendant Picou's notice of candidacy for a school board election was held to be deficient, and he was disqualified as a candidate.…

Also in this document: Dissent · Sanders; Dissent · Marcus.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Langridge v. DauenhauerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Merlis J. Broussard v. Chalin Octave PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Broussard v. PerezDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
  4. Rousseau v. Democratic Parish Executive CommitteeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Blanchard v. PicouLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Becker v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Butler v. CantrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Edwards v. PattersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Harrison v. DeliseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Smart v. CurryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API