Hurtt v. Sch. Dist. No. 29 Big Ho

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and would affirm the District Court.

The District Court Finding of Fact Nos. 5 and 18 state:

“5. That on August 30, 1979, Plaintiff and Defendant school district, through its Board of Trustees, executed a written contract, prepared by Defendant, whereby Plaintiff was employed to supervise the school of the Defendant district for the school term of 1979-1980, consisting of 220 days and seven (7) pupil instruction related days, for a total compensation of $20,000.00, payable over a 12-month period, plus a housing allowance of $125.00 per month.”

“18.…