Legal Opinion

Pilant v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided June 24, 2005No. A-8708PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Mark W. Pilant was arrested for driving while under the influence. Following his arrest, Pilant submitted to a breath test; this test showed that his blood alcohol level was .078 percent. At Pilant’s trial, the jurors were instructed that if they concluded that the breath test was properly administered, then they were allowed to infer that Pilant’s blood alcohol level was at least equal to this test result — .078 percent — at the time he was driving:

[If you find that the breath test was administered] in substantial compliance with the methods approved by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  2. Kalmakoff v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valentine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  2. Valentine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API