Anderson v. Hull

Bruñe, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case comes to us in a thoroughly confused state, due in no small measure, we believe, to the fact that the appellants (defendants in the trial court) have undertaken to represent themselves in this litigation.

The appellants make two contentions in their brief: one that they were denied due process of law in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; the other, that the trial court erred in entering judgment by default against them. We find it necessary to consider only the second contention.

On…