Legal Opinion

Hanau v. Betancourt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1990No. 13-90-411-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEYS, Justice.

Relators are beneficiaries of the will of Robert C. Hanau. Respondent, the Honorable A.G. Betancourt, is Presiding Judge over the County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas, and the real party in interest is Dorris Dunn Hanau, former executrix of Robert C. Hanau’s estate (the estate).

Mrs. Hanau and relators had disputed whether certain investments were community or separate property. The Supreme Court found in relators’ favor and on July 22, 1987, issued its mandate in Hanau v. Hanau, 730 S.W.2d 663 (Tex.1987). Respondent then held numerous hearings, during which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Interfirst Bank-Houston, N.A. v. Quintana Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  3. Estate of Hanau v. HanauTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Zalta v. Tennant, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. Shivers Well Service, Inc. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API