Legal Opinion

Storey v. Dick Matz Agency

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1976No. 12400PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

Opposing parties in this cause disagree as to the total commissions due the agent who effected sale of two parcels of real property under written contracts between the parties. There is no claim by either party that the contracts, identical in terms on the subject of commissions, are ambiguous. The amounts of the commissions due the agent will be determined as a question of law under construction of the written instruments.

Appellants, Gertrude Wolf Storey and Marguerite Wolf Lee, are former owners of two contiguous tracts of land in Williamson *508County, each tract containing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Bellmead State Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. EilersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Dick Matz Agency v. StoreyTexas Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API