Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Pascher

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 7, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBoneparth, J.

Motion to strike this case from the jury calendar.

The plaintiffs’ first note of issue, which failed to demand a jury, is claimed to he the result of a mistake. This note of issue was served by mail on December 2, 1954, and was never filed. Within five days after service of the note of issue on defendants’ attorneys, plaintiffs’ attorney wrote a letter correcting this mistake, and served a note of issue requesting a jury trial. The corrected note of issue was filed almost immediately thereafter, to wit, on December 8,1954, as shown by our records. No prejudice has been shown.

Under these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Investors, Inc. v. Laurelton Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Schwartz v. Sunlight Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Rafkind v. IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Prehle v. GraemeNew York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schrank v. Rensselaer Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API