Legal Opinion

State v. Pierson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1991No. 90-966PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Kent H. Pierson, Jr., was convicted in the county court of carrying a concealed weapon, in violation of Omaha Mun. Code, ch. 20, art. VII, § 20-192 (1990). He was sentenced to pay a $50 fine and timely appealed to the district court, where the conviction and sentence were affirmed. The defendant has appealed to this court, contending the district court erred in holding that § 20-192 of the Omaha Municipal Code was not unconstitutionally vague. In the alternative, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

In order for an issue of constitutionality…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LonneckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Strawberries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ValenciaNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. JoubertNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. ConklinNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. KelleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Health v. JeffreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API