Legal Opinion
Santisteven v. Dow Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1974No. 73-2639PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Raymond Santisteven, an employee of Kennecott Copper Corp., was seriously injured while using flake caustic soda manufactured by Dow Chemical Company. Workmen’s Compensation benefits were paid Santisteven under the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act, Nev. Rev.Stat. § 616.010 et seq. He then brought this action against Dow on theories of negligence and products liability based upon alleged mislabeling. Dow impleaded the employer for indemnity, claiming that Kennecott’s failures to properly instruct its employee and to provide a safe place to work were the sole proximate…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Arthur Araujo v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket Steamship Authority v. New England Telephone Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Howard University v. Good Food Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Lopez v. A.C. & S., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.