Legal Opinion

Bradley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 2005No. 2D04-5791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Gipson v. State, 616 So.2d 992 (Fla.1993); State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991); Castle v. State, 330 So.2d 10 (Fla.1976); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 888 So.2d 621 (Fla.2004); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Ishmael v. State, 735 So.2d 509 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Plowman v. State, 586 So.2d 454 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

After this court held in Boyd, 880 So.2d at 728, that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Castle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Middleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Collinson v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API