Hicks v. Straub
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1
TARNOW, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Petitioner Michael Hicks, through his attorney, Carole Stanyar, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he is incarcerated in violation of his constitutional rights. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan. He challenges his 1993 conviction for first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The Court finds that Petitioner’s right of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michael Hicks v. Dennis M. Straub, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Meade v. LavigneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Hicks v. StraubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Michael Hicks v. Dennis M. Straub, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004