State ex rel. Brown v. McIntosh
Supreme Court of Missouri
Mandamus. Relator’s contention is that she was on June 4, 1897, by virtue and authority of the Act of 1883, a dentist, and that she had a right to practice dentistry in the State of Missouri. Upon the pleadings herein, we have the admission by respondents that relator, on June 4, 1897, was lawfully engaged in the practice of dentistry or dental surgery in the city of St. Louis.
Read the full summary
Mandamus. Relator’s contention is that she was on June 4, 1897, by virtue and authority of the Act of 1883, a dentist, and that she had a right to practice dentistry in the State of Missouri. Upon the pleadings herein, we have the admission by respondents that relator, on June 4, 1897, was lawfully engaged in the practice of dentistry or dental surgery in the city of St. Louis. State ex rel. v. Fisher, 119 Mo. 350. The certificate issued by the city register or clerk of the county court is prima-facie evidence of the right of the holder to practice dentistry, and whenever he is prosecuted for…
1Opinion of the CourtLamm, J.
This is an original proceeding in tMs court by mandamus to compel respondents, styled the “State Board of Dental examiners for the State of Missouri” (Laws 1905, p. 214), hereinafter called the “hoard,” to issue to relator a license, or “renewal license,” to practice dentistry in accordance with sections 8527 and 8528 of the Dentist Act of 1905 (Ann. Stat. 1906, p. 400, et seq.)
An alternative writ went, requiring respondents to issue such license immediately on receipt thereof, or appear and show cause why it has not been done.
Respondents made return. On the coming in of that return, relator…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. HathawaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State ex rel. Granville v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Keene v. WyattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- State ex rel. McAnally v. GoodierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Moore v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hyde v. Jackson County Medical SocietySupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Matter of Application of VictorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Dawson v. CasterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State Ex Rel. MacKey v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- State Ex Rel. McClellan v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.