Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hernandez v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1991Published

1DissentAlexander, J.

In order to avoid an "unnecessarily harsh result,” the majority today holds that in the "unusual situation” where an infant is the sole distributee of a decedent, the time within which the personal representative of the decedent’s estate must commence a wrongful death action under EPTL 5-4.1 is tolled by CPLR 208 until a guardian is appointed for the infant, or until the infant distributee reaches majority, whichever occurs first. Because this interpretation constitutes nothing less than sheer judicial legislation, I dissent.

It is well established that the courts "do not sit in review of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Carrick v. Central General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Liff v. SchildkroutNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API