Legal Opinion

Ragland v. Ragland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1996No. S96A0249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Chief Justice.

The parties to this appeal are both educators and are members of the same retirement system. The jury provided in the alimony portion of the verdict in the parties’ divorce action that Mr. Ragland would pay Ms. Ragland a specified sum until he retired, at which time he would pay her one-half of his retirement benefits; that she would, when she retired, pay him one-half of her retirement benefits; and that both would choose the 50 percent survivor option available under their retirement system. The trial court’s judgment required both parties to select the survivor option…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foskey v. FoskeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Andrews v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Winstead v. WinsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hipps v. HippsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Hawkins v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Shepherd v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. Hawkins v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API