Legal Opinion

in Re Verna Francis Coley Thetford

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2019No. 17-0634Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 17-0634 ══════════ IN RE VERNA FRANCIS COLEY THETFORD, RELATOR ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ══════════════════════════════════════════ Argued October 10, 2018 JUSTICE BROWN, joined by JUSTICE DEVINE, JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, and JUSTICE BUSBY, dissenting. A trial judge’s discretion in guardianship proceedings should be wide and deep. As the Court correctly observes, so much turns on what the judge can see and hear—what a cold record does not reveal. But as guardianship proceedings become more abundant as our…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Epic Holdings, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. NCNB Texas National Bank v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. GodbeyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Franks v. Roades, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API