Legal Opinion

Kusak v. Allstate Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 5, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: On February 20, 1990, plaintiff’s employment as an insurance agent for defendants was terminated. Plaintiff brought this action against defendants in February 1991, asserting six *1051causes of action. In May or June 1992, plaintiff learned that defendants were sending letters to policy owners in which he was referenced as the agent. Plaintiff moved to amend his complaint to assert a seventh cause of action alleging violation of Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51. We conclude that Supreme Court should have granted the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Forte v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Newton v. Aqua Flo Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Agway, Inc. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates v. CochemsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Kaplan v. SparksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Goldbas v. HobaicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc. v. YazowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API