Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hill

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 26, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John M. Keane, S.

Domestic animals have long been favored companions of man and have eased the burdens of his labors. So much so, that from time to time men blessed with worldly goods seek, in a last will and testament, to grant some benefit to a particular animal or animals in general. Whether they act from love of animals or hate of men, litigation often ensues after their death.

Even an animal hater probably would not complain if the bequest to benefit a dog was, figuratively, only a bone. But when the bequest is substantial and, figuratively, a whole quarter *37of beef, then even those who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Will of HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. In Re the Probate of Will of HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. In re the Will of HamiltonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farm Sanctuary Inc. v. PattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In the Estate of HerrigNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
  3. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Tax CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API