Legal Opinion

Keller v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 5, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The only disputed issue in this criminal appeal is whether it was reversible error for the Trial Court to amend certain counts of a grand jury indictment after the close of testimony and before counsel’s summation to the jury. Defendant contends that the amendments changed the substance, as distinguished from the form, of the indictment and were therefore impermissible. We agree and therefore reverse. 1

Appellant, Albert J. Keller, was tried in Superior Court on various charges, including multiple counts of theft through false pretense in the sale of motor vehicles, in violation of 11 Del.C. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BlendtSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
  2. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. State v. HudsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Coffield v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. Harley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. Kornegay v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API