Kromer v. Central Coal & Coke Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Greenwood District; Paul Little, Judge; 1. Argues tbe merits of tbe cause, but tbe court does not pass upon them. 1. Tbe transcript shows that defendant filed no motion for a new trial and tbe judgment must be affirmed. 26 Ark. 536; 27 Id. 37; 35 Id. 536; East v. Cotton Oil Co., 126 Ark. 462.
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Appellant obtained a judgment by default against the appellee July 15, 1915, for $86.00 and costs. On July 10,1916, appellee filed its motion to set aside tbe judgment obtained against it by default at a former term, setting up various grounds. The record recites: “Upon the bearing of tbe foregoing motion tbe following testimony was introduced by plaintiff and garnishee, which was all tbe testimony that was introduced in said proceedings, towit: ’ ’ Then follows the testimony which was preserved by tbe bill of exceptions, consisting of record entries and documentary evidence, showing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steck v. MaharSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
- Young v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Independence County v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Merriweather v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
- Farquharson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Swilley & Sons v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928