Legal Opinion

Hale v. Water Resources Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 2002No. CC 8; A107303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Petitioners seek review of a final order of the Water Resources Department (department) denying their application to include their lands within the boundaries of a certificate for the use of irrigation water from the Umatilla River. We affirm.

We take the following facts from the department’s findings. In 1965, the Stanfield Irrigation District (district) applied to the department for a permit to divert water from the Umatilla River to irrigate approximately 13,000 acres. In response to the application, the department issued Permit 30789. That permit established a deadline of December 31,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Justice Resource Center v. Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API