Legal Opinion

People v. Cummings

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1959No. Crim. 6068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem. *

By information filed by the dis trict attorney of the county of Los Angeles, appellant Cummings and one Jordan were charged (count I) with conspiracy to commit abortion (one Leonard Maxwell Arons, James Utley, Ed Nasif, Geneva Owens, Evelyn Kooistra, John D. Crum and Mary Campbell were named as coconspirators but were not charged) ; count II, an abortion on one Grace Fiad on the 24th of February, 1956; count III, an abortion on one Ruth Campbell on the 6th of April, 1956; count IV, an abortion on one Harriet Robinson on the 4th of May, 1956; count V, an abortion on one…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. WeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. KempCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. MolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API