Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Criminal Court of Dallas. Tried before the Hon. Geo. H. Craig.

1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Saffold, J.

— The appellant was convicted under an indictment for selling liquor to a minor.

A barkeeper, whose business is to sell fermented, vinous, or spirituous liquors, is within the meaning of R. C. § 3619, which prohibits any person who keeps these liquors from selling them to minors, &c., whether he owns the saloon or the liquors, or is merely employed to sell them.

The intention of the accused is an essential ingredient in this ‘ offence. But, in most cases, the act is .conclusive evidence of ■the intention. When the facts which constitute the offence are proved, the burden is thrown upon the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Loeb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. State v. PistonaWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API