Consumer Education & Protective Ass'n v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Colins,
The Consumer Education and Protective Association (CEPA)1 appeals from an order of the Philadelphia *145County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) which affirmed the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s (SEPTA) fare increases effective in July, 1986, and denied CEPA’s request for access to certain documents and information in SEPTAs control.
The Pennsylvania Urban Mass Transportation Law (Act 101)2 sets forth SEPTAs legal powers and responsibilities. Among those powers, Section 303(d)(9)3 of Act 101 permits SEPTA “[t]o fix, alter, charge and collect fares,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Young v. Armstrong School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Colonial Gardens Nursing Home, Inc. v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Hoffman v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Vartan v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Mergenthaler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sapp Roofing Co. v. Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local Union No. 12Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- TIMES PUB. CO., INC. v. MichelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Sierra Club v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Tribune-Review Publishing Co. v. Allegheny County Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lewis v. Monroe CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.