Legal Opinion

Pazda v. Memminger's Painting, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Contrary to the contention of plaintiff, defendants established that plaintiff was not “curtailed from performing his usual activities to a great extent rather than some slight curtailment” for 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the accident (Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230, 236; see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Horan v Mirando, 221 AD2d 506, 507). In response, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Horan v. MirandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API