Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Pattberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 5, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Young, J.:
The action is brought to recover $1,250 upon a promissory note apparently given in part payment of the purchase price of premises known as 6905 Third avenue in the borough of Brooklyn, though no evidence was introduced to establish this. The defense and counterclaim are substantially an alleged breach of the covenant against incumbrance contained in the deed of conveyance to the defendant of the premises in question, in that there are encroachments of the building upon the public street.
They are evidenced by a survey, but there is no evidence that they have been removed, or that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Delavergne v. NorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Acme Realty Co. v. . SchinasiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- McGuckin v. . MilbankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- City of N.Y. v. . N.Y. S.B. Ferry S.T. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Acme Realty Co. v. SchinasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barrera v. ChambersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bibber v. WeberNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Bibber v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Gamorsil Realty Corp. v. GraefNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Fusilli v. FeldNew York Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.